AEO agency services: SEO, answer engines and GEO in one programme

Integrated.Social is an SEO and AEO agency for B2B that runs search and answer engine work as one programme, so the pages that rank in Google are the same clear, evidenced pages ChatGPT, Perplexity and AI Overviews can read. One plan avoids conflicting fixes and duplicate pages, and one senior lead reviews the work.

SEO supports Google AI Overviews because Google's guidance, AI features and your website, says normal SEO best practice applies: a page must be indexed and eligible to show a snippet, with no extra special optimisation. So we fix crawling and indexing first, then write clear answers to the questions your buyers ask. Google alone decides which pages appear in an AI Overview.

An Answer Engine Optimisation (AEO) agency makes a sourced, signed claim easy for an answer engine to quote, then checks whether that visibility brings in the right lead. Generative Engine Optimisation (GEO) applies the same discipline across AI search surfaces. Neither approach can promise a ranking or citation date.

SEO supports discoverability in ordinary results; AEO and GEO make buyer questions, evidence and entity context easier to interpret across answer surfaces. They work as one programme, not as separate promises.

We work with B2B teams across the UK, remotely. Delivery can also support international buyers where the scope and evidence are appropriate.

Use a fixed set of buyer questions, record the answer engine, date, visible sources and result, then repeat the same panel over time. A single answer is an observation, not proof of lasting visibility or commercial impact.

Scope depends on the priority pages, evidence, implementation responsibility and commercial problem. See pricing for current starting points and ask for a scoped recommendation rather than an assumed retainer.

No. Answer systems and search engines decide what to surface. The work improves clarity, evidence and measurement; it does not guarantee a citation, rank, lead, pipeline or revenue outcome.

No. A crawler-accessible llms.txt file and visible, accurate FAQPage markup can help machines understand a page, but search and answer systems decide whether to cite it. The practical standard is clear answers, stable entities, corroborated claims, technical accessibility and ongoing measurement, not a guarantee.

Answer engines use different retrieval systems, indexes, ranking signals and update cycles. A citation in one product is an observation, not proof of visibility everywhere. Keep source evidence and page structure consistent, test a defined query set over time, and report each system separately.

Not by default. Public, indexable pages should remain available to legitimate search and answer-engine crawlers where the business wants discoverability. Protect private APIs, authenticated areas, rate-limited forms and abusive automation separately; do not confuse those controls with blocking public editorial pages.