
What Does an AEO Agency in the UK Actually Do?
66% of UK senior decision-makers now use AI in procurement. Here is exactly what a UK AEO agency does, what to look for, and what questions to ask before you appoint one.
Weekly PoV on Answer Engine Optimisation, Agentic AI lead generation, Google AI Overviews, ChatGPT search ads, AI governance, and persona-driven B2B GTM. Written for enterprise marketers who need to win citations in AI-powered search, not just rankings.
Browse by topic
Showing all articles.
Four decision-stage guides for B2B marketers evaluating AI search investment. Each post answers a distinct question buyers ask before signing an AEO contract.
Browse by topic
Microsoft VP Bryan Goode argues in Fortune that AI agents may make SaaS the execution layer rather than the human interface. It is an argument, not a measured outcome. The durable implication for B2B software is to make capabilities, permissions, data contracts and invocation paths clear enough for an enterprise agent to understand and use responsibly.
An AEO agency should improve the conditions that make a company understandable and citable in AI-assisted research, then connect that work to a genuine commercial decision—not sell an SEO retainer with new labels.
A good ABM agency in London runs a named-account and buying-committee system that sales can use—not a lead-generation campaign with a location page and personalisation sprinkled on top.
ABM for fintech and financial services works when risk, compliance and procurement are treated as buying-committee members and every campaign claim is permitted, evidenced and owned.
OpenAI has cancelled GPT-6.1 Astra’s planned October release after internal testing found the model did not meet its safety and alignment bar. That decision is a meaningful release-gate signal. The harder question is governance: what evidence should a company disclose when an increasingly capable agent exceeds its scope, and what should enterprises demand before they grant one authority?
Reuters and Axios report that OpenAI is nearing a $70B annualised revenue run-rate, while fresh reports put a possible private funding valuation between $1.2T and $1.4T. The more useful question is not whether the number is impressive. It is whether AI revenue can compound faster than the cost of the intelligence required to produce it.
The latest U.S.–China AI talks created a dialogue on national-security AI incidents, not a breakthrough agreement on AGI or superintelligence. Current systems are becoming more capable, but neither AGI nor superintelligence is an established deployed fact. For marketing, manufacturing and workforce leaders, the near-term signal is clear: plan for fast adoption, supply-chain uncertainty and stronger operating controls — not a science-fiction finish line.
An AEO assessment should show what was checked, what evidence supports each finding, what remains unverified, and how progress will be measured—not ask executives to trust a black-box score.
Google’s Connected Apps rollout makes a conversational AI layer a new way to reach work, creative and lifestyle software. It does not show that SaaS products have been replaced. It does create a more immediate governance question: when a request begins in Gemini and crosses into another application, who defines the permitted action, verifies the result and can reconstruct what happened?
Enterprise AI spending can rise while sustained value falls because buying models, licenses, and pilots is easier than redesigning the real work around them.
Yes—if they can be converted into bounded, testable instructions without losing their human accountability.
Possibly—but only if “wrong” means treating a visible AI citation as the whole measure of value. Google has publicly said it is piloting a new way to partner with websites whose content meaningfully contributes to the freshness and factuality of generative AI responses through grounding. Separately, reporting by Digiday and Search Engine Journal describes an invite-only “AI contribution” pilot that may pay participants when content significantly shapes an answer rather than when it is visibly linked afterward.